Online gaming is a very large industry. Despite the governments’ attempts to crack down on it, people all over the world realize that if you find a good gambling online bonus, you can make a lot of money playing online. As long as people keep on making money hand over fist with a good gambling online bonus, the industry will continue to flourish.
Gamblers have been much more likely to try a new game online, as opposed to at the casino. 75% of respondents said they have played a game online first, before playing it at casino, if ever. Reasons given were less intimidation regarding making mistakes at the table, lower minimum bets online, online instructions, and ease of play. People making sports bets online also said that the fact that online sportsbooks would give them free money (via a gambling online bonus) definitely increased their desire to play online. This conclusion makes sense when you think about it. If someone is going to give you money to bet one sports, why not go for it? You’re playing with the casino’s money.
58% of respondents said playing a game online has led them to try the same game at a casino. The same finding applies to sports betting. People that place bets on sports games via an online sportsbook often do the same at a land casino. Typically, the players don’t like the fact that they can’t get a gambling online bonus at a land casino. These players typically go back to placing bets online after a short stay at a land casino.
First of all, we have a little misdirection about Jack Abramoff and his disregard for the legislative process DominoQQ . This comment, and others that have been made, follow the logic that; 1) Jack Abramoff was opposed to these bills, 2) Jack Abramoff was corrupt, 3) to avoid being associated with corruption you should vote for these bills. This is of course absurd. If we followed this logic to the extreme, we should go back and void any bills that Abramoff supported, and enact any bills that he opposed, regardless of the content of the bill. Legislation should be passed, or not, based on the merits of the proposed legislation, not based on the reputation of one individual.
As well, when Jack Abramoff opposed previous bills, he did so on behalf of his client eLottery, attempting to get the sale of lottery tickets over the internet excluded from the legislation. Ironically, the protections he was seeking are included in this new bill, since state run lotteries would be excluded. Jack Abramoff therefore would probably support this legislation since it gives him what he was looking for. That does not stop Goodlatte and others from using Abramoff’s recent disgrace as a means to make their bill look better, thus making it not just an anti-gambling bill, but somehow an ant-corruption bill as well, while at the same time rewarding Abramoff and his client.
Next, is his statement that online gambling “hurts individuals and their families”. I presume that what he is referring to here is problem gambling. Let’s set the record straight. Only a small percentage of gamblers become problem gamblers, not a small percentage of the population, but only a small percentage of gamblers.
In addition, Goodlatte would have you believe that Internet gambling is more addictive than casino gambling. Sen. Kyl has gone so far as to call online gambling “the crack cocaine of gambling”, attributing the quote to some un-named researcher. To the contrary, researchers have shown that gambling on the Internet is no more addictive than gambling in a casino. As a matter of fact, electronic gambling machines, found in casinos and race tracks all over the country are more addictive than online gambling.
In research by N. Dowling, D. Smith and T. Thomas at the School of Health Sciences, RMIT University, Bundoora, Australia “There is a general view that electronic gaming is the most ‘addictive’ form of gambling, in that it contributes more to causing problem gambling than any other gambling activity. As such, electronic gaming machines have been referred to as the ‘crack-cocaine’ of gambling”.