Game Theory

A game is basically a structured, repeated form of activity, usually undertaken solely for entertainment or relaxation, and at times used as a teaching tool. Games are generally different from work, which usually is done for remuneration, and in comparison to art, which is normally more a F95ZONE creative expression of philosophical or aesthetic elements. However, games can be used to learn a lot about a subject.

For example, the game of chess involves the player controlling one character, on whom chess moves, making the whole activity very complicated. But we can use this activity to understand a lot more about how the mind works. For example, if we consider chess, the main complication in playing chess is that of the white and black chess pieces, because white can move anywhere on the board, whereas black can only do one thing at a time, namely, place their pawns at certain positions on the chessboard. The main challenge comes from the fact that there are constantly fifty two possible chess pieces (Pawns, Rooks, Knights, Bishops, Queen and King), plus the twenty-two chess board patterns, all of which have to be carefully analyzed and interpreted. If we consider the game of Rock, there is another complexity associated with it. Here, one has to remember that not only are there fifty two possible game pieces, but the board itself has to be rearranged and “moved” around the board, so that the different game pieces do not occupy the same spaces on the board.

Prisoners of War is another very complex game theory, where players compete not just to have the most soldiers (pawns) alive, but also to have the most prisoners (warhorses). In this case, the concept of the prisoner solves itself through the game theory: it turns out that if everyone has a horse, then the strongest military force can always beat the weakest, just by having more people. However, unlike the previous game theory, Prisoners of War is played with a twist: you don’t get to see which player has the most warheads (the key element here), so it turns out that skill instead of strength is the deciding factor. Thus, the way to win is to have the most skill.

The prisoner 2 dilemma is a variant of the prisoner game theory, where two players each get a piece that they cannot change, in a way that makes them both equally miserable. For example, in the first phase of the game, each player receives three soldiers. After that, both players can agree to exchange those soldiers for one more soldier of their choice. This way, a certain portion of the population is happy and the others are miserable, so depending upon the characteristics of your pieces, either you or your opponent can win.

The third major type of theory is the dictator game theory, where two players are at a table, each with a different set of available properties. In this setup, a certain amount of property is either owned by one player or not, and each player gets to take another property before the game ends. The value of a property is changed by each economic model chosen, so it may be a very interesting experience to see how one might use his resources effectively against another’s.

There are also some game rules that depend on how each player chooses their starting point. For example, if all starting places are equally accessible, then each player receives a single coin from the start of the game. The starting point can either be on a bank of property, on a highway/highway intersection or anywhere else, where each player has a straight line of sight to all other starting locations. A good rule of thumb is to play the starting location that gives you the maximum number of free properties. But remember, as long as you have an adequate number of starting points, your starting hand should be capable of covering all possible routes and locations in the game, as well as providing sufficient opportunities for your opponent to make blunders.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.